Recognition of arbitral awards is the legal procedure by which a foreign arbitral award is declared enforceable in another country. At Musch Legal, we work daily with the New York Convention 1958 for worldwide enforceability. The convention has 170+ signatory states and offers arbitration its unique advantage over state proceedings: virtually automatic recognition in almost every jurisdiction.

What is the legal issue? (Why is recognition different from court judgments?)

Thanks to NYC 1958, arbitral awards enjoy worldwide enforceability in 170+ countries — whereas state court judgments are often recognized only to a limited extent per treaty area. This is a fundamental advantage of arbitration. At the same time, the opposing party can invoke refusal under Article 5 NYC. In the Netherlands, recognition takes place via the Amsterdam District Court under Article 1075 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure and Article V NYC.

What does the law say? (Which frameworks affect recognition?)

The 1958 New York Convention (United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards) is a cornerstone, with 170+ signatory states. Article III: recognition is mandatory. Article V: exhaustive grounds for refusal (jurisdiction, due process, scope, composition of the tribunal, non-arbitrable, public order). Under Dutch law, Article 1075 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure applies to proceedings via the Amsterdam District Court. Comparable in other Contracting States with proceedings via specialized courts.

For domestic arbitral awards, Articles 1062-1066 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure (declaration of enforceability via the Preliminary Measures Judge).

Subject matter

NYC 1958 Article

Ground for refusal

Valid arbitration clause

Art V(1)(a)

Non-binding or invalid

Due process

Art V(1)(b)

No notice or no opportunity

Scope

Art V(1)(c)

Outside scope of arbitration clause

Tribunal

Art V(1)(d)

Not in conformity with agreement on composition

Arbitrability

Art V(2)(a)

Not subject to arbitration

Public order

Art V(2)(b)

Conflict with public order of country of recognition

Subject matter

NYC 1958 article

Ground for refusal

Valid arbitration clause

Art V(1)(a)

Non-binding or invalid

Due process

Art V(1)(b)

No notice or opportunity

Scope

Art V(1)(c)

Outside the scope of the arbitration clause

Tribunal

Art V(1)(d)

Not in accordance with the agreement on the composition

Arbitrability

Art V(2)(a)

Not subject to arbitration

Public order

Art V(2)(b)

Contrary to the public order of the country of recognition

What risks do companies face? (What goes wrong with recognition?)

The opposing party may invoke refusal under Section 5 NYC — typically on the grounds of public order in contested awards. Procedural errors in arbitration proceedings (no notification, incorrect composition) can lead to refusal. In non-arbitrable cases (such as criminal cases, bankruptcy), recognition may be refused. In some countries (China, India, Russia), there is traditionally a greater reluctance to grant recognition.

Practical example from our practice (How did we win a recognition case?)

Musch Legal represented a Dutch client with a 2.1 million dollar SIAC arbitral award against an Indonesian opposing party. We applied for a declaration of enforceability from an Indonesian court. The opposing party contested the grounds of public order under Section 5(2)(b) NYC. We successfully defended under Indonesian Arbitration Law (Act 30/1999) and referred to the Soerjadi precedent. Recognition granted within 14 months. Enforcement via local bailiff.

What can you do? (How do you optimize recognition?)

Document the arbitration proceedings carefully: due process, notifications, tribunal composition. Avoid procedural errors that could trigger grounds for refusal under Section 5 NYC. For recognition in the Netherlands: request a declaration of enforceability from the District Court of Amsterdam under Section 1075 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure. For recognition abroad: engage local counsel. For enforcement risks in difficult jurisdictions: choose the seat and arbitrator selection carefully when contracting. Engage Musch Legal for recognition strategy.

How does the New York Convention work?

Executing a Dutch judgment abroad

Executing a foreign judgment in the Netherlands